חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם

The Physico-Theological Argument👎

שו"תThe Physico-Theological Argument👎
שאל לפני 12 חודשים

Good afternoon
Contrary to the common claim that a complex thing indicates someone was aiming for it, there is also the possibility that someone simply repeated conditions that could create it with a slim chance many, many times.
As an answer to the example of the factory that works by itself and therefore probably has a planner, one can give an example of some classic miracle story that almost certainly stems from enough trials in which coincidence can happen and then only the successful case is noticed. Every exceptional case can be classified into one of two factors according to the characteristics of the exceptional case.
Therefore, when we look at our universe, and see something very, very unusual, two ways can also initially arise for the anomaly to have been created. How did we choose? We did not choose. Both ways are possible. In conceivable scenarios such as a miracle story or a project, it is relatively easy to classify, but in the health of universes we do not understand, how do those who decide on one side have any idea whether universes are more prone to intelligent formation or to very abundant formation?
In short, both the intelligent creator and many universes are proven only from an indirect conclusion about their existence and one of their properties from observation of the universe, and both are sufficient explanations, and because of our lack of familiarity with the creation of universes, it is not possible to decide between them.


לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

0 Answers
מיכי צוות ענה לפני 12 חודשים
This is the claim of the anthropic principle. I discussed this at length in the third notebook and in my first standard book.

לגלות עוד מהאתר הרב מיכאל אברהם

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button
הירשם לעדכונים על תגובות חדשות בדף זה