Peace. On the sidelines of the discussion on the positive coverage of the woman's head hair, see demand 1, I saw that Amos Bracha published that in your letter to him you wrote \ "that the permit itself has a place \" (but not at all from Rabbi Mashash's reasons). And the Japanese for your article above.
After reviewing, maybe you can understand me where in your article there, or at all, you wrote the reasons?
For your letter see google.com/view/minagshelkishot Reviews
Thanks
And congratulations to your book.
I did not write the arguments because that was not the topic of discussion. The article dealt with Rabbi Mashash's arguments.
Leave a comment
Please login or Sign up to submit your answer