Question

Hello, honorable Rabbi.
If I have found favor in your eyes, let me ask something.
If the laws of nature are special and fine-tuned for the creation of life, why is there no life on all the other stars?
And if all the laws are arranged to bring about life, how do we know that random laws would not also bring about life, given that these laws are the only ones we have?
Tell me if I am right:
All the laws of physics, biology, etc., are basically like in the parable of the computer program that randomly generates the sentence “To be or not to be.” These laws can be examined—their limits and their nature—but it is impossible really to understand how they were created (is it really impossible?) and what they really are. These laws of nature basically govern matter and energy and led to the creation of complex life. In essence, we are the product of a machine called the universe, which seemingly operates according to random laws. But all this is valid only within the universe; the moment one looks at the machine from the outside, one sees how all the parts operate in an orderly way, and such a thing cannot be by chance.
The creator of that wondrous machine lets it do the work, but does not himself intervene in order to make sure that more perfect tools come out of it. And in the analogy, the divine hand never did anything after the formation of the laws of nature (although apparently there were a few cases that were not connected to the laws of nature and their workings, but rather to statistics—for example, I heard that if the energy at the time of the Big Bang had been different by a few precise terms, then matter would never have been formed, and so on).