Q&A: The Science of Freedom
The Science of Freedom
Question
Hello Rabbi,
I didn’t understand your conclusion regarding the nonexistence of a physical solution to free choice from quantum theory.
A. I don’t understand anything about this theory beyond what you wrote in the book, but—who says that the particles move randomly? Seemingly, the fact that we don’t know how they move doesn’t justify saying that it’s random, only that there is a sufficient reason or cause that we still haven’t found. After all, that’s how the physical world works, so why go so far as to say that it’s random?
B. Even if we assume that we found that quantum theory operates for a reason or sufficient cause—that still wouldn’t require a materialist approach. At most, it would mean that I identify in the physical world a phenomenon of atoms moving without a physical motive, but that doesn’t tell me that the motion doesn’t stem from something non-material.
I’d be glad to hear your opinion,
Ariel
Answer
Hello.
A. I explained this in the book. Randomness is not choice, especially since there is a distribution dictated by quantum theory, and that does not allow for choice. As for the need for randomness—you need to study quantum theory and its interpretations. We are not talking about a lack of understanding but about randomness, and that is not the same thing.
B. I didn’t understand the question.