חדש באתר: NotebookLM עם כל תכני הרב מיכאל אברהם. דומה למיכי בוט.

Q&A: The IDF Oath Ceremony

Back to list  |  🌐 עברית  |  ℹ About
Originally published:
This is an English translation (via GPT-5.4). Read the original Hebrew version.

The IDF Oath Ceremony

Question

It is customary today that at the IDF oath ceremony they say, "I declare," and not "I swear." Is it really because that oath would be halakhically valid that they therefore do not say it?

Answer

I didn't understand the question. Which oath is valid? When they declare, or if they were to swear?
https://asif.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/zhr-11-1.pdf

 

Discussion on Answer

Elad Buchris (2022-12-31)

Hello Rabbi, the attached link no longer opens.
Is there a halakhic problem with saying "I swear"? I don't really understand why.

Michi (2022-12-31)

It's an article by Rabbi Benayahu Brunner in Tzohar 11: https://asif.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/zhr-11-1.pdf
Here is a response to the article: https://asif.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/zhr-13-13.pdf

Michi (2022-12-31)

I also updated the original link.

Elad Buchris (2022-12-31)

Thank you very much.

Elad Buchris (2022-12-31)

I just didn't understand one thing. According to Rabbi Rimon's comment immediately after the quote from Maimonides (page 3 of the article), apparently even saying "I declare" is problematic.

Michi (2022-12-31)

I haven't read it. But there is no oath here according to all opinions. It's not only that the wording of an oath is missing, but also the intention of an oath.

Elad Buchris (2022-12-31)

"From the words of Maimonides it emerges that answering 'Amen,' or another response whose meaning is acceptance of the oath, is considered as though he swore a full oath in every respect, even if a gentile or a minor administered the oath! From here, the response of the person being sworn is considered as though he himself swore…" (quote from Rabbi Rimon's article).
According to his view, does it come out that there is really no difference between swearing and declaring?

Michi (2022-12-31)

As I explained—no. There is no intention of an oath here, and no answering Amen.

Michi (2022-12-31)

Besides, the one administering the oath too (if there even is one; I think today there no longer is) does not intend it as an oath. After all, he is secular and the context is secular.

Elad Buchris (2022-12-31)

Okay, thank you very much.

השאר תגובה

Back to top button